Geoff Winestock, Moscow based corespondent for the Journal of Commerce writes:
“December 1994 – Ever have this experience as a Westerner entering a Russian factory? You walk into a Directors office. You take a seat at the long table where management sits at those interminable planning sessions. Meanwhile, the Director Arkady Prokopyevich, or whatever his name is, continues to sit at the dominant position behind his desk. His inscrutable secretary brings strong tea and dry crackers.
Arkady Prokopyevich tells you how badly things are going at the business. Workers have not been paid for three months. No one pays their debts. It is impossible to plan ahead. Yes. you agree, the company does look to be in pretty run-down condition.
But on the other hand, you know the company must be generating some cash. It does sell metal or widgets or oil to the West, it does earn hard currency from a big transport company, it does have a local monopoly.
You then notice Arkady Prokopyevich, under his Soviet cut suit, is wearing a Rolex watch and a Italian tie. Inquire politely and he will tell you about his next business related trip to some sunny destination. Yes, he has just bought a lovely dacha. This, of course, is easy to do. He could sell off the company’s property and pocket the money.
But this can be risky, so the more sophisticated director will set up a related trading company that will buy the factory’s goods at below cost then make an outrageous profit. Even more subtle forms of robbery by factory directors involve delivering goods to customers who do not pay in exchange for a kickback.
So while the factory is doing badly, Arkady Prokopyevich is doing fine. Even though he will publicly complain about the non-payments crisis, slow bank transfers and non-payment of wages, he is secretly delighted.
This sort of director will be hard to do business with, hard for Western businesses to deal with until they realize the he evaluates every proposal not in terms of benefit for the company but in terms of benefit for himself.
These directors fear most the appearance of real shareholders who will take control of their companies. Luckily, for the directors, even though privatization in Russia has notionally been under way for three years, very few factories have actually acquired real shareholders.
The main reason is that in most factories. despite voucher privatization, shares are still mainly held by workers, who have not got a clue abut business and are still in awe of their old bosses, and by the government, which has given up exercising any active role in managing its shareholdings.
Of course, directors themselves have usually managed to acquire a big stake in the shares in their own companies, often using the money they robbed from them.
In a few cases, outside shareholders capable of looking after their interests are now starting to appear on the registers of the Russian Companies. This is an unpleasant phenomenon for the Arkady Prokopyeviche’s out there.
They complain loudly. They say the outside shareholders are foreigners with Western methods who do not understand Russia’s specificity. When the outsiders are Russian, the directors accuse them of being mafia structures.
In many cases, however, this is just a smoke screen. The directors often object to outsiders simply because they will expose the large scale theft of shareholder’s property that is an essential part of the way business has been done here for the last 70 years.
The Russian Director’s Dilemma:
Hot water may be free in Russia, unlike many more civilized countries, but it doesn’t come problem-free. And, as we all know, sometimes it doesn’t come at all.
Every summer, the killjoys at local water heating facilities all over the country douse our joyful revelry in the lush greenery and soaring temperatures of summer with three weeks of cold, cold water.
How is it, one asks oneself as one stands shivering in the shower’s icy torrents, that a country that invented the pirozhok and sent the first human into space could fail to devise a system for cleaning the hot water pipes that doesn’t involve inflicting mass torture on its citizens and “guests of the country?” Russia as Churchill once aptly observed, is a puzzle wrapped in a question inside an enigma.
Of course, optimists may look at the bright side and say that hardship builds character, helps one to count one’s blessings and does many other useful things. Stone-age man lives without hot water, as did the nobility of the eighteenth century – who who were known for bathing as little as possible, in fact.
But in a former super-power entering the 21st century, there can be little excuse for the barbarism of the annual practice of shutting off the city’s hot water supply.
One can only conclude that everyone responsible for the hot water hardship – from President Yeltsin himself down to the lowliest controller at a hot water plant – has his or her own personal hot water heater. How else to explain the lack of action on the matter?
Now Yuri Luzkhov, recently elected mayor of Moscow, says the city is unlikely to have a continuous supply of hot water for another 20 years.
Chto za bezobraziye”
This last phrase as near as I can tell means, stop the ugliness!
“Noise proves nothing. Often a hen who has merely laid an egg cackles as if she had laid an asteroid.”